Re: Another new project and trigger languages
From: | Sally Caves <scaves@...> |
Date: | Monday, January 13, 2003, 19:02 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Amanda Babcock" <langs@...>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 06:15:29PM -0800, Garth Wallace wrote:
>
> > For one of my languages, I'm using a generalization of this. Nouns are
> > marked with affixes that roughly correspond to their "rank" of
> > importance in the sentence (one of them is most important, although
> > beyond that they're pretty much interchangeable), which I'm calling
> > "ordinals". The verb is marked with the ordinals of its arguments,
> > inflected to show role (agent, patient, recipient, etc.). Since
> > adjectives are stative verbs, the possessive form of a noun actually
> > derives a stative verb, and adverbs are replaced with a "manner"
> > case-role, word order is incredibly free. Is this a workable system?
>
> This is beautiful! I'm jealous. I'm always casting about for original
> ways to represent things, and I think you've found that here.
>
> Amanda
I second that! This sounds terrific. Can you give a more detailed example,
Garth?
Sally Caves
scaves@frontiernet.net
Eskkoat ol ai sendran, rohsan nuehra celyil takrem bomai nakuo.
"My shadow follows me, putting strange, new roses into the world."
Replies