Re: CHAT: Final Fantasy (was Re: CHAT: anime & manga)
From: | Muke Tever <alrivera@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 5, 2001, 23:37 |
From: "David Peterson" <DigitalScream@...>
> In a message dated 12/5/01 6:12:25 AM, yl112@CORNELL.EDU writes:
>
> << <laugh> I couldn't make heads or tails out of the storyline, but then, I
> haven't played any of the Final Fantasy games either, merely *sat through*
> all of them as my friends played obsessively. >>
>
> <ascends soapbox> Oh, trust me, you don't need to not play the games to
> still be confused by the movie (or that sentence, for that matter...). Every
> aspect of the movie was poorly written. And as to the comment on bad
> acting...well, I never thought Alec Baldwin and Steve Buscemi where bad
> actors--rather the opposite, in fact.
Well, me I didn't say the voice actors were bad... I meant the characters... er,
what I meant was:
- A normal movie is actors on a set playing out a story.
- These actors can be good or bad; they can display emotion well or
poorly; they can overact; etc.
- Animation is usually thought of as representing things
directly: I'm not drawing a guy in a rabbit suit playing
Bugs Bunny, I'm drawing Bugs Bunny himself.
- I *might* do an excellent animation of a man in a rabbit suit
playing Bugs Bunny poorly.
- Final Fantasy looked sort of like it was doing this. The animation
was realistic (except on Aki), but not quite of people in the world
of 2065.
Something like that.
*Muke!