Re: Question about Latin.
From: | Elliott Lash <erelion12@...> |
Date: | Monday, October 18, 2004, 0:11 |
> It seems to
> belong
> > to a different way of thinking and analyzing
> (since it
> > was attached at the end of the secund term, which
> > looks very weird to us): perhaps it came from some
> > ancient language of a different type ?
>
> The suffixing "and" is from Proto-Indo-European,
> being therein simply
> *-kwe, and it's retained in Latin and Sanskrit, and
> quite possibly others
> about which I have no immediate memory, but a clear
> and present vague
> feeling.
>
It also survives in archaic Old Irish, as "-ch"
And it's found in Gaulish, I think, as "-pe" and
Celtiberian perhaps as "-cwe"
In Gothic you have "nih" which means "and not", where
the "h" is probably from this same particle. There are
other such compounds in Gothic as well.
Elliott
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Reply