>
> BP Jonsson wrote:
>
> >While we're at it: does anyone know an easy-to-come-by description of a
> >typicallly polysynthetic language, as per the "languages without arguments"
> >thread.
>
> I've been thinking about writing a mini-grammar of Chickasaw for my web
> page.
> If there is enough interest, maybe I will start. As it stands now, I have
> three stories (two verisons each) that were told to my advisor by her
> consultant. There is no translation, but most words are hyperlinked to a
> glossary, so the adventurous could do a little bit of analysis. The URL is:
>
>
http://www.bol.ucla.edu/~smithma/Chickasaw/chickasaw.html
>
> Marcus Smith
Please do. Although the situation has improved in recent years
it still seems as though there is very little information widely
available on the Muskogean lgs.
--
Brad Coon
bcoon@imt.net
Somedays when you wake up, its just not worth chewing through
the leather straps.