Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Fluid-S pivot in Old Albic

From:# 1 <salut_vous_autre@...>
Date:Tuesday, August 9, 2005, 22:50
Jörg Rhiemeier wrote:


>Hallo! > ># 1 wrote: > > > With the most recent change in the Vbazi grammar (more recent that the >post > > in which I described it), it seems simple to represent the two meanings >of > > "The man threw the ball and fell" > > > > That change is that the verb can no longer inflect for the dative >argument > > as principal argument and the dative argument always goes after the >verb. > > That way, the verb can only agree for the object if there is one or the > > subject if not. > > > > So, the verbs agrees in person, number, and case(Nom/Acc) with its > > absolutive argument. > >So an intransitive verb has a nominative marker, and a transitive >verb has an accusative marker? >
Yes, eaxactly. In sentences like "I sleep" and "You love me" the two verbs are marked for the first person but "love" will also take the accusative marker Thinking about this, I don't know if in fact it should be classed as a transitive marker...
> > This way it is easy to distinct "The man threw the ball and [the man] >fell" > > and "The child threw the ball and [the ball] fell" by using nominative >or > > accusative on "to fall" > > > > jaljl jehi jylnjyzbeinjai ai jylmizdjai > > jal -jl jehi jyl -njyzbein-jai ai jyl -mizd-jai > > ball-ACC Man PAST-throw 3rd/S/ACC and PAST-fall-3rd/S/ACC > > The man threw the ball and (the ball) fell > > > > jaljl jehi jylnjyzbeinjai yi jylmizdja > > jal -jl jehi jyl -njyzbein-jai yi jyl -mizd-ja > > ball-ACC Man PAST-throw 3rd/S/ACC and PAST-fall-3rd/S/NOM > > The man threw the ball and (the man) fell > >You seem to like the letter |j|, or whatever phoneme you use it >to represent ;-) >
It's only due to chance the words for "man", "ball", "throw", and "fall", the past prefix and the 3rd person suffix each contain the phoneme /j/ written as |j|. Actually, it's not phoneme that appears so often in the language, that sentence is special. :-P
> > (The conjonction "and" between two verbs is not the same depending if >the > > two verbs have the same ending or not, a third one is used when it is > > between two nouns.) > > > > It would be the only possibility for an intransitive verb to take an > > accusative ending, it depends of the first mark used in the sentence. > > > > Does this work? > >I see no reason why it shouldn't, though I haven't seen anything >like that before. Very original! >
Thanks - Max

Reply

# 1 <salut_vous_autre@...>