Re: Phonetics vs. Phonemics (was: apparently bizarre 'A's)
| From: | René Uittenbogaard <ruittenb@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, February 24, 2006, 12:35 |
|---|
On 2/23/06, Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> wrote:
> You mean [PM]! I see no reason for a valuable monograph like [P] to
> be used as an alternative to [v\] in CXS, when symmetry demands that
> it be used for IPA [ϕ] (phi). The CXS chart should be amended at
> once! At once, do you hear? :)
I'd have no objection, I like [v\] better for the labiodental
approximant anyway.
René