Re: THEORY : reverse clitization
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Saturday, August 23, 2003, 21:01 |
Quoting Pavel Iosad <edricson@...>:
> Hello,
>
> > > While at it, are there terms for a clitic fully detaching
> > to become an
> > > independent word, or attaching fully to become an affix?
> >
> > For the latter notion, yes: _grammaticalization_. For the former
> > (e.g. the recent development of "ex" for "former spouse"), I don't
> > believe there is a distinct word, but perhaps "degrammaticalization"
> > would do.
>
> Umm, "lexicalization" is the word I think (though it's ambiguous as well
> of course)
Words are just labels, of course. I'd prefer not to use
lexicalization myself sense it's not closely associated
with a morphological process.
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally,
Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right
University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of
1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter.
Chicago, IL 60637