Re: Terminological discussion
From: | J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 3:44 |
In a message dated 05/14/2002 12.46.08 AM, christophe.grandsire@FREE.FR
writes:
>En réponse à Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...>:
>
>> It somehow doesn't sound as a compliment if you are identified as a
"whimlanger".
>
>Our resident whimlanger Chang probably disagrees on that :))) .
Oh, yes! I disagree. But I am more adaptable than hell-on-wheels and thus
I like the lablang neologism better (I am _not_ limited to whimsy and
whimsical word-mangling, ya know!) and therefore declare myself a lablanger
::puts on lab-rat mask:: ;) *gigloctet!* ::scampers off to do serious
mischief and mutant damage to all sorts of "stolen" roots::
>Christophe.
>
>
Hanuman Zhang /'hanuma~n dZahN/Avatar of Sun WuKong,
a.k.a. "Monkey," a.k.a. "TricksterGod of Chinese Boxers"
~ om hung hanumatay rudratmakai hung phat ~
mantra to Hanuman the Hindu Monkey TricksterGod
~§~ thee Prizc ov Existenz iz Ætern'l Warfær 'n' Creativ Playf'llniz ~§~