Re: Visual. Inuit and other things.

Abrigon Gusiq wrote:

> Some form of visual language for translation would be grand, something
> similiar to how Chinese works. Two or more) languages that technically are
> not related can be called Chinese.
I suppose one could define a bunch of grammatical operators
and assign them to the !@#$% etc keys, and use a numeric
classification scheme for the open-class words, sorta like
Dewey-Decimal. I don't know how complete the semantic coverage
is, but there's this:

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/5383/uld2in.html