Abrigon Gusiq wrote:
> Some form of visual language for translation would be grand, something
> similiar to how Chinese works. Two or more) languages that technically are
> not related can be called Chinese.
Nothing not related to Chinese can (sensibly) be called Chinese.
There are several mutually unintelligible languages (5-9) called
"Chinese".
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)