Re: Has anyone made a real conlang?

Joe Fatula wrote:

JF> When making a definition of "language",
JF> maybe we ought to see what it should
JF> include, and what it should exclude.
JF> Andrew, tell me which of these you'd
JF> consider languages.  Perhaps that will
JF> clear up the differences between some
JF> of our terminology.

We could go to an extreme and say that
release of a pheromone attracting the
opposite sex of an insect species is a
language. We need many terms to describe
many kinds of languages.

Reply