Andrew Nowicki wrote:
> Joe Fatula wrote:
>
> JF> When making a definition of "language",
> JF> maybe we ought to see what it should
> JF> include, and what it should exclude.
> JF> Andrew, tell me which of these you'd
> JF> consider languages. Perhaps that will
> JF> clear up the differences between some
> JF> of our terminology.
>
> We could go to an extreme and say that
> release of a pheromone attracting the
> opposite sex of an insect species is a
> language. We need many terms to describe
> many kinds of languages.
You didn't answer the question.