Re: NATLANG: Chinese parts of speech (or lack thereof)
From: | Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> |
Date: | Monday, August 9, 2004, 18:49 |
On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 13:59:43 -0400, John Cowan <jcowan@...>
wrote:
> In the meantime, various other systems have been devised more or less
> independently: these turn out to always be syllabic.
Although arguably in the less-independent column, there are Sorang Sompeng
(an abugida), Ol Cemet' (an alphabet), and Varang Kshiti (which is a
defective abugida), all invented for minority languages in India.
Paul
Reply