Re: Evidentials for a future English
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Thursday, October 21, 2004, 4:35 |
Henrik Theiling scripsit:
> I like the idea of evidentials. Don't let them have one for 'I know
> from trustworthy sources, that...' :-)
>
> I have evidentials as one of the very few mandatory categories in
> Q'eng|ai.
For those who care, the 14 Lojban evidentials (none of
which are mandatory, and one of which is deliberately
nonspecific) can be found, with examples and explanations, at
http://www.lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter13.html#s11 .
Note that "I generalize"/"I particularize" form a morphologically related
pair, and "I expect"/"I experience"/"I remember" form a morphologically
related triplet (future/present/past).
Lojban doesn't have the "double hearsay" or "FOAF" evidential, though....
--
Only do what only you can do. John Cowan <jcowan@...>
--Edsger W. Dijkstra's advice http://www.reutershealth.com
to a student in search of a thesis http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Reply