Conlanging as art (was: New Survey etc.)
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Monday, January 6, 2003, 5:44 |
Roberto Suarez Soto scripsit:
> Though, thinking more about it ... I suppose it's very similar
> to any art :-m There are both a rational part and an inspirational part
> involved. So maybe I have to agree with you, after all this r:-)
Indeed. Sculpture and even more so architecture require rational
consideration also: sculptures (and even more so buildings) that
destroy themselves when constructed are not considered good artworks.
Likewise, if you are writing a song, you must consider the limitations
of the human voice or other instrument, and this is a rational
consideration altogether.
--
Knowledge studies others / Wisdom is self-known; John Cowan
Muscle masters brothers / Self-mastery is bone; jcowan@reutershealth.com
Content need never borrow / Ambition wanders blind; www.ccil.org/~cowan
Vitality cleaves to the marrow / Leaving death behind. --Tao 33 (Bynner)
Reply