Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: English diglossia (was Re: retroflex consonants)

From:Jake X <starvingpoet@...>
Date:Friday, January 31, 2003, 20:47
> Let's not exaggerate. Literature hasn't been spelled "the old way" > for anything like 1000 years. "Whan that Aprille with his shoures > sote / The droghte of Marche hath perced to the rote, / And bathed > every veyne in swich licour, / Of which vertu engendred is the flour;" > etc. Late 14th Century. Standard spellings for words didn't really > exist until dictionaries became popular in the 18th century*. So in > practice you're looking at less than 300 years of mostly consistent > spelling.
I'll give you that, and I was aware of this. I really must admit I got carried away in that email, it was partly out of fun. But spelling would be a serious issue if the reforms were as drastic-- and as weird-- as they were in my email. This from a person who learned how to spell by staring at a word for a long time to see if it "looked right."
> Still, that's hardly a negligable amount, and probably accounts for > the majority of books in existance. Certainly there would be a > certain amount of difficulty, in the event of a language reform. RI, > at least, follows current conventions well enough that most old words > would be recognizable (as I understand it). Also, it's a lot easier > to learn to read odd spellings of familiar words than it is to produce > them. It doesn't take much practice to become used to the spellings > of familiar words in Middle English - the difficulty comes from words > which are obselete, which wouldn't apply in this case. I suspect that > the kind of people who enjoy "the beautiful scent of dust from the > book not beeing read for 150 years" would probably be willing to learn > to recognize old spellings.
It's spelled obsolete. I usually wouldn't correct like that, but this time, it's in the spirit of the thread. hehe
> Tim May
(a name which, incidently, would be spelled the same after my wacky spelling change) Jake
> > * Even for proper nouns - the surviving signatures of Shakespeare show > considerable variation (and none of them are spelt "Shakespeare").

Replies

Tim May <butsuri@...>
Joe <joe@...>