Re: new(?) phoneme discovered
|From:||René Uittenbogaard <ruittenb@...>|
|Date:||Monday, March 13, 2006, 17:35|
On 3/12/06, John Vertical <johnvertical@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've thought of interpreting [@] as the voiced one... I think you
> > > may've hit on the one corresponding with creaky or tense phonation?
> >Well, in my interpretation every vowel counts as the voiced one..
> >And I don't know about "tense phonation" but it's definitely not
> >creaky.. it's a whistle.
> OK, not creaky. But you do need to contract your glottis, not widen it,
Contract it, yes, but just the right amount. Most of the time I have
to "search around" a bit before it catches.