From: | Mike Ellis <nihilsum@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Sunday, April 3, 2005, 1:42 |
Andreas Johansson wrote:>> Either that or this eliminates distinctions in spelling that remain in >> pronunciation -- but again the distinctions that "don't need" to be kept in >> spelling are again German-skewed (s/z, T/t, a/@ ...). > >It's not entirely clear to me how collapsing a/@ is German-skewed ... ? > > AndreasGah. That should've been a/V . M