Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: 'Yemls Morphology

From:Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...>
Date:Tuesday, July 10, 2001, 13:21
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 06:23:24 -0500, Thomas R. Wier
<artabanos@...> wrote:

>Jeff Jones wrote: >> >> I've noticed that it's easier to stress the long syllable, but didn't >> know if it was considered a universal. I've decided that stress in >> 'Yemls will be primarily pitch-based, which reduces the problem. Also, >> most roots will have 3 moras, usually with the first one stressed, and >> many of these will have long or quasi-long syllables combining the first >> 2. > >I forget: did you say that your roots are monosyllabic,
If I did, I didn't mean to! One problem, I think, is the term "syllable". 'Yemls uses a "syllabary", meaning one symbol per "syllable". However, linguistically, this is not a syllable but a mora. On the other hand, my explanation wasn't meant to be an precise analysis aimed at linguistics professors (It does need to be rewritten, though -- sorry).
>or do they vary in how many syllables they have?
Most typically, they have 3 _moras_, but some of 2 and a few have only 1. There will also be some with more than 3. A 2 mora sequence may combine into a single long _syllable_, or quasi-syllabic unit as I see it, through both vowel reduction and combination of adjacent vowels. So a 3 "syllable" word would have either 2 or 3 _syllables_. A possible exception might be something like {Mst} where ['mOsUtU] is reduced to [mOst]. This might be considered a single _syllable_ having 3 _moras_. On the other hand, the final [U] may reappear in some phonetic environments, giving ['mOs.tU]. I think native speakers would hear 2 or maybe 3, syllables in all cases. Jeff
>I ask, because a single syllable having three moras is very rare -- but >again, there are counterexamples, in this case, Finnish and Estonian both >require such an analysis. > [An aside: >One of the reasons my phonology professor didn't like one aspect of my >analysis of the Wintu stress system was that I assumed that moraicity was >idiosyncratic (some coda consonants were moraic, others weren't; which >isn't that unusual, cf. Turkish) but that I also assumed that some >syllables had three moras. My analysis actually explained the behavior of >the stresses more accurately, but her point was that it was >methodologically unsound, which is I suppose a valid point.] > > >Thomas Wier | AIM: trwier