Re: Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
From: | Jeff Rollin <jeff.rollin@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 2, 2007, 21:57 |
In the last episode, (On Monday 02 July 2007 22:21:56), David J. Peterson
wrote:
> Jeff wrote:
> <<
> Just caught up on this. Looks like body-part nouns are inalienable
> and take a
> suffix?
>
>
> If they're inalienable, doesn't that mean they shouldn't require
> a suffix--e.g., you'd just say "the head", and that'd mean "my
> head"...?
>
My understanding is that "inalienable" means "cannot be unpossessed", e.g. you
couldn't say "I saw a [disembodied] head lying on the ground", but would have
to say "I saw someone's head lying on the ground".
Jeff
--
"Please understand that there are small
European principalities devoted to debating
Tcl vs. Perl as a tourist attraction."
-- Cameron Laird
Reply