Re: OT More pens (was Re: Phoneme winnowing continues)

Mark J. Reed ikrí:


> To look at it from the skeptic's point of view: if you have to resort to
> "faith" to convince someone of something, then it's religious.
>
> To look at it from a believer's point of view: if something is so
> inobvious that you have to "prove" it to believe it, then it's not
> religious.
Aaargh. I didn't want to take part in this discussion because of the Golden Rule
"No cross no crown no green star", but still... I don't think evolution is
obvious, or has enough proofs. I don't want it taught "the only right thing".
Don't call it "theory". Let it be "a wide-spread hypothesis", ok?

~~~~~~Yitzik~~~~~~