> Someone wrote:
>
>
http://www.janbrett.com/alphabet/cursive_alphabet_main.htm
> > > (This is what "cursive" writing looks like in America.)
> >
> OK, yes. It isn't _quite_ the old Palmer style, which was a little
> more....shapely? If I had a scanner.... But in fact, the site shows
> what
> Palmer became for most of us (and then steadily declined to our present
> day
> chicken-scratches
>
> Next question for Christophe and other Europeans: how does it compare
> to
> what you were taught (and apparently still use)??
Most of the lower case letter are quite similar to mine; the only ones that
differ much are "t" and "z". Then there are some minor differences; my "b" is
closed, I add a horizontal line thru the descender of "q", my "s" have a less
reduced upper curl, and the general style is a bit more angular.
The capitals are out-and-screaming different. Mine looks much closer to
machine-printed capitals than to this.
Andreas