Re: OT More pens (was Re: Phoneme winnowing continues)

From: "Nik Taylor" <yonjuuni@...>
Subject: Re: OT More pens (was Re: Phoneme winnowing continues)


> There really are many ways in which Darwinistic evolution could be
> disproven (which, of course, is what makes it a scientific theory.
> Religious beliefs can't be disproven, scientific theories can)
That's probably a pretty good definition.  Then again, can it be disproven
that Shakespeare wrote "Romeo and Juliet", or would we need a time machine
to do that?  Where would historical facts fall in this set of possibilities?

Reply