Boudewijn Rempt and (firstly) James Campbell wrote:
> > I take your point - I suppose that Type 1s are safer in this respect?
>
> Even though ATM does all kinds of incredible things
> to insinuate itself in your machine, it seems to be a safer option.
> Of course, any X server supports Type1 directly.
Until OpenType font embedding comes along or some other standard which
everyone finally agrees on (if ever), maybe PDF is a possible answer?
> > I wrote a small program which generates
> > the HTML and IMG tags required to display the text in the Rahha script;
I
>
> I'd be interested in that code: I'm currently working on a page
> about the Denden chancery script, and I thought I'd take the GIF
> route too, but I'm a bit afraid of all the work.
Yes, the Rahha pages would be impossible to create without some automation.
I'll contact you privately about the code.
James
=========================================================================
James Campbell james@zeugma.force9.co.uk http://www.zeugma.force9.co.uk
"Love's the only country I know" - The Blue Nile
=========================================================================