From: | Henrik Theiling <theiling@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Saturday, April 28, 2001, 9:34 |
Hi! D Tse <exponent@...> writes:> > Because it is unnecessary to do this in an auxlang, it should be > > avoided, I think. E.g. have one form that's underspecified and two > > additional ones that specify male and female. > > > > **Henrik > > > > Or you could just be completely gender neutral :PYou mean *no* words for `man' and `woman'? Those are the only words in my language that have gender information since I found it somewhat not uninteresting to talk about the difference. :-) **Henrik