Re: Origin of the word 'kivismi'
From: | D Tse <exponent@...> |
Date: | Saturday, April 28, 2001, 1:08 |
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Daniel44 <Daniel44@...> writes:
> > As for soika/soike, the ending 'soika' is common and though it literally
> > translates as man, no sexist offence should be taken from it.
>
> Intension is not what counts. In German `man' (impersonal pronoun,
> something like `one', oftern translated as `you') has no gender, but
> because it is derived from `Mann', it is assumed to be sexist by many
> women. So is `Mensch' (human), because it comes from
> `Mann+<umlaut>+sch'.
>
> Because it is unnecessary to do this in an auxlang, it should be
> avoided, I think. E.g. have one form that's underspecified and two
> additional ones that specify male and female.
>
> **Henrik
>
Or you could just be completely gender neutral :P
Imperative
Reply