Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: [YAPT] Judge my vowels

From:J. 'Mach' Wust <j_mach_wust@...>
Date:Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 0:18
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:18:13 +0200, Christian Thalmann <cinga@...> wrote:

>In the light of recent discussion about Swiss German >phonetics, I acquired some insecurities about my grasp >of the IPA vowels, in particular of the front unrounded >persuasion. So I thought up this test: > >1) I recorded a "vowel ladder" from the top to the > bottom: [i I e E & a A].
I would have labeled the first three sounds [i I_r I]. But I see you all agree about the third sound to be represented as [e], so I guess it's me who is wrong. The second sound file, however, reinforces my view that in German, the vowels of |bitte bete| have the same sound, though it would be [e]. The sound of English |bed, bet|, as I have it in my ear, would be just between the third and the fourth vowel. At least, the Bärndütsch e-vowel would. Likewise, it'd be either represented as [e_o] or as [E_r], which would perfectly explain why it's sometimes represented with [e] and sometimes with [E].
>2) I recorded a latter of similar words from > different languages to demonstrate that I do > distinguish all the vowels mentioned in 1). > Explicitly, the words are: beat [i], bit [I], > Beet [e] (High German), bed [E], Bett [E] (High > German), bat [&], bätt [a] (Swiss German), > Bad [a ~ A] (High German), Baad [A] (Swiss > German).
?? I'm confused: It seems to me that some vowels of the second sample don't match with the ones of the first sample: The vowel you label '[&]' in the first sample is labeled '[a]' in the second, whereas the vowel you label '[&]' in the second sample doesn't occur in the first. Or do my ears cheat me? I'd represent the [&] of the first sample with [&_o]. I agree with Roger Mills that this sound isn't identical with [a] (as in standard German or French or Italian). BTW, I've found another IPA chart with sounds that I like better than the Norwegian 'Sound reference to the IPA', the site that goes accompanies Peter Ladefoged's Course in Phonetics: http://hctv.humnet.ucla.edu/departments/linguistics/VowelsandConsonants/course/chapter1/chapter1.html g_0ry@_ˆs: j. 'mach' wust

Replies

Mark P. Line <mark@...>
Philippe Caquant <herodote92@...>