Re: Subcreation and image [was: RE: Betreft: Re: Steg's wonderful .sig (and a question)]
|From:||Boudewijn Rempt <bsarempt@...>|
|Date:||Wednesday, November 10, 1999, 8:33|
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, FFlores wrote:
> Coming back to subcreation, it's interesting to see that in
> Christian orthodoxy, as Lucifer is himself a creation of God,
> he can't create himself -- but why can't he *sub*create?
As far as I understand is that sub-creating is following your
created nature; if you revolt against your created nature you
lose it, can't follow it anymore. Lucifer decided he wanted
to have nothing of God, therefore he lost his nature and thus
his (sub-)creative abilities.
Boudewijn Rempt | http://denden.conlang.org/~bsarempt