Re: New member greets list :-)

> > I'd say jump right in with both feet. :-)
>
> That is, unless your conlang's hypothetical speakers don't have feet...
>
> In a language spoken by a race of people without lower limbs,
> would one word mean both "arm" and "leg"?
Among a race of people with only one set of limbs, there wouldn't be
the need for the distinction between "arm" and "leg".  You'd just have
one word which I suppose one would translate into English as "limb".

My conlang doesn't have "hypothetical speakers", though: I've never
really been into the conculture side of things.  The furthest I've gone
in that direction has been thinking of "native names" that fit my lang's
phonology pattern.  Maybe I will do in due course...?

K.