Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: First report on Conm

From:John Cowan <jcowan@...>
Date:Wednesday, March 26, 2003, 16:04
Christophe Grandsire scripsit:

> Typical right-handed propaganda. It's completely untrue. First, there's no > right-handed majority. There's only a right-handed *plurality*.
Fair enough.
> Second, you > can't treat fully right-handed people differently from the rest. There are > no "degrees of left-handedness", only "degrees of lateralisation", from the > left to the right.
Well, the distinction is partly semantical. I myself have never met a fully obligate sinistral. My daughter is as sinistral as they get, and would automatically eat left-handed if we didn't require her to do otherwise, but the fact is, we can alter her behavior in this way. I no more could learn to eat left-handed than I could learn to walk on my hands. The distinction is not about preference, but about capability.
> And I'm pretty sure if left-handed people hadn't been persecuted for centuries > the amount would be much more balanced.
I doubt it. Apes don't seem to be lateralized, but Neanderthals were -- the pattern of teeth wear shows that they held hides in their right hands to strip the flesh off them with their jaws. Of 20 individuals measured, 18 showed right-handed wear.
> There's no right-handed "norm" from which left-handedness > would be a "deviation", more or less acute depending on the person.
By no means. If it makes you feel better, think of it as a distinction between "flexible, more or less" and "utterly inflexible". I think non-dextral people have trouble grasping just how lateralized dextrals actually are.
> I find your way extremely clumsy (or gauche ;)) ).
We think it's awkward (historically: in the "awke" or back-handed direction) too, but it's locked in to the culture.
> That's what happens when you put ten people on a table for six ;))) . Have > correctly sized tables and you won't have that problem ;)) .
Don't move to New York City, my friend.
> > Umm, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't work for females too. > > Because it involves holding a body part that women usually lack ;))))) .
That too is a continuum. :-) But to come to the point, there is nothing about manual-genital contact that is a strictly male behavior: on the contrary. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@...> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

Replies

Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Dan Jones <devobratus@...>