Re: Natural Semantic Metalanguage

In a message dated 11/16/2007 11:21:04 AM Central Standard Time,
imploder@CENTRUM.CZ writes:


> I think what they propose on that page is a bad and hardly feasible
> approach to semantics. I've criticized it here:
> http://www.spinnoff.com/zbb/viewtopic.php?p=564994#564994
> and also in this ZBB thread:
> http://www.spinnoff.com/zbb/viewtopic.php?t=25585
>
> I haven't read any of their books, I just consider what's on that page.
> Maybe there's more to it but this page simply says the words listed there
> are "semantically primitive" (but I don't see any way they really are, and
> why specifically these words)
As you say, you haven't read any of their books.
I suggest you do so.

stevo   </HTML>

Replies