Re: Conlang Typology Survey
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Monday, May 26, 2003, 9:21 |
En réponse à J Y S Czhang :
> >
> >LOL. I just *need* to have that in Maggel ;))) (maybe one of the few
> >productive derivative features ;)))) ).
>
> Well, of course, especially since the modern speakers of Maggel are
>direct-descendants of Pict-like barbarians. Right, CG?
LOL, indeed. And I'm still thinking of adding an edible-inedible
distinction in 2nd and 3rd person pronouns when referring to humans ;)))) .
Christophe Grandsire.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.