Re: vowel scheme for new language
From: | JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <mpearson@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 19, 1999, 23:34 |
On Wed, 19 May 1999, dunn patrick w wrote:
> Well, that looks like a general consensus of "no way". Hrmm. I noticed a
> tendency of it to run away from me anyway. That damned /i/ insisted on
> showing up.
>
> > Or: i u
> > e o
> > a
>
> What's a pity is I like this vowel scheme. Always have. But I'd *hate*
> to use it since it's so damned common. Conlang guilt, you know?
For my conlang Tokana, I assuaged my guilt by adding a sixth, central
vowel to the mix, giving:
i u
E @ O
a
This system is much less common - although by no means unprecedented
(Romanian has it).
Another thing you could do is go the West African route, and have
tense /e,o/ and lax /E,O/ be different phonemes, giving a seven
vowel system:
i u
e o
E O
a
Or you could add front rounded vowels to the mix, giving a different
seven vowel system:
i/y u
e/oe o
a
Or you could add a length distinction, or nasalisation... Lots
of ways to minimally modify the common five vowel system to get
something a bit more 'exotic'...
Matt.