Re: Phonology/orthography sketch
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Friday, May 30, 2008, 8:23 |
Ämne: Re: [CONLANG] Phonology/orthography sketch
Från: Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...>
Datum: Fri, 30 May 2008 10:05:21 +0200 Till:
Constructed Languages List
<CONLANG@...>
Eric Christopherson skrev:
> On May 29, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Lars Mathiesen
> wrote:
>
>> This is fun. Since Benct hasn't answered, I'll
>> give it a go...
>>
>> 2008/5/28, Ingmar Roerdinkholder
>> <ingmar.roerdinkholder@...>:
>>> shouldn't ihtas be ['ixtas]? since above you
>>> said: 'h' = [x]
>>
>> It is. // // is superphonemic representation,
>> //"i1tas// = /iGtas/ = [ixtas].
>
> Is that like archiphonemes?
>
>
>
It's morphophonemics. Check "Morphophonology" on
Wikipedia.
A simple familiar example is the English
plural/possessive/3sg, ending which is
underlyingly //z// even when it becomes /s/ by the
familiar Germanic devoicing assimilation.
Simply put it's about the string of morphemes
before any context-dependent phonological rules
are applied.
/BP 8^)>
--
Benct Philip Jonsson -- melroch atte melroch dotte se
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"C'est en vain que nos Josués littéraires crient
à la langue de s'arrêter; les langues ni le soleil
ne s'arrêtent plus. Le jour où elles se *fixent*,
c'est qu'elles meurent." (Victor Hugo)
Reply