Re: CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
From: | Tom Wier <artabanos@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 25, 1999, 15:55 |
Irina Rempt wrote:
> I don't know whether the South African [sk] is a real dissimilation
> or a reflex of the dialect of some of the settlers.
Hmm... you're right, it could be from an earlier dialect (much as
American dialects that have [&ks] come from ealier English dialects),
but I would think that originally, there had to be the dissimilation anyways
(assuming, of course, that the [sx] cluster predated the [sk] in any dialect).
=======================================================
Tom Wier <artabanos@...>
ICQ#: 4315704 AIM: Deuterotom
Website: <http://www.angelfire.com/tx/eclectorium/>
"Cogito ergo sum, sed credo ergo ero."
There's nothing particularly wrong with the
proletariat. It's the hamburgers of the
proletariat that I have a problem with. - Alfred Wallace
========================================================