Re: CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
From: | FFlores <fflores@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 25, 1999, 21:01 |
Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> wrote:
> Approximatization?: I'm not sure if this is a real term, but fricatives
> sometimes become approximates. Most common is rhoticization, wherein
> /z/ becomes /r/. So that, for instance, pre-OE *waese became waere
> (modern were).
PIE (or Italic, or whatever) /s/ became /z/ and then /r/ in Latin
also. But I don't know what Latin <r> was. Was it an approximant,
a flap, or a trill? How did Spanish end up with both sounds?
I know a lot of Spanish words have the trilled <rr> in borrowings
from Euzkadi (Basque), but that can't be the only source. Anybody
knows?
--Pablo Flores
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Zymurgy's Law of Volunteer Labour:
People are always available for work
in the past tense.