Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Discuss the features?

From:Javier BF <uaxuctum@...>
Date:Wednesday, May 8, 2002, 18:02
>I was here when the thread on Futurese began. At the time, I believed >it wouldn't wander off ("discuss the features", or so was written), >but having read samples of sarcasm and not-so-polite statements and >questions (which remind me of the pages either criticizing or defending >some IALs), I fear I'm (we are) experiencing what once lead to the >creation of the AUXLANG list: > > "You're wrong!" > "May I know why?" > "Yes, Your Highness..." > >I know I can always unsubscribe. But I won't. > >I know I could just ignore the lines/messages that make me feel >discontent/unhappy/sorrow/sad/down (I can't find the right word; >perhaps I should coin one? :) and simply delete them. The point is >that it bothers me to know that such a discussion is going on here. > >I wonder if the thread on Futurese wouldn't be more suitable for the >AUXLANG list... Or is it [still] within bearable/tolerable limits? >I must stress that I am NOT in any way against Futurese. I just >wouldn't like quarrels to arise -- at least not like the ones >I've read about. > >I've been reading material and visiting sites concerning conlanging >and became aware of the perils of discussing IALs... or could it be >that I'm too much affraid [for nothing]? I've never taken part in >such heated discussions (not that I'm willing to), but I believe >they don't ever take us anywhere.
So do I; I DO HATE flame wars and that's why I explicitly said "Regard it just as a conlang". But several people here have explicitly said they like to start flame wars and so they started to make irrelevant questions (I mean, irrelevant to what I said I was here to discuss: the features of the language, not politics) like "How do you plan to introduce the language?" and the like. So I think it wasn't that unjustified that I got annoyed. I thought that saying "It is intended as an IAL" was necessary for you to know what kind of requirements the design of the language should meet, but know I feel it would have been much better that I had simply said "Hey, please have a look at this conlang project and tell me what you think about it". Javier.