Re: CHAT: On the term 'engelang'
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 21:02 |
Andreas Johansson writes:
> Carlos Thompson wrote:
> >And Rosta wrote:
> >
> > > The pronunciation of "engelang" is obvious once you know the
> > > etymology -- as is often the case with English spelling. And <enge>
> > > is the natural spelling, given the pronunciation; cf. henge, sprenge,
> > > revenge.
> >
> >But this is kind of a "ghoty" thing, as those examples of "enge" for
> >/EndZ/ are all word final. I would have pronounce engelang as /EN@l{N/.
> >Probably enge-lang would work better.
> >
> >But, of course, I am not a native English speaker.
>
> Well, neither is I, but medial _nge_ for /ndZ/ does occur in English;
> "strangely" comes to mind, strangely enough!
>
It does, but only (so far as I am aware) in cases where the morpheme
ending -nge also occurs alone. "Enge" is not a word, although it
if it were an English word there would be no difficulty in knowing how
to pronounce it.
> Still, I can't say I'm too thrilled by _engelang_ either. Let's unthrill all
> the natives and spell it _enjlang_!
>
> Andreas
I'm leaning towards enlang, myself. The j in enjlang obscures the
etymology, for me, and /ndZl/ isn't that easy a consonant
cluster. (Maybe it's just me who finds it so - it is in "strangely"
after all.)