Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, May 7, 2008, 7:08 |
On 7.5.2008 Henrik Theiling wrote:
> aliqu'unum rakun
Why l > r here, where no cluster is involved?
> The syncope is very early, so I don't think I can easily
> move the -r- metathesis before it.
I suspected that, but thought I'd suggest it anyway.
> (Or 'Latin Brugal'? Would require l>r in more
> contexts. Hmm...)
Definitely! _Brugal_ sounds so vulgar... :-9
> Conlanging is fun. :-)
The best thing with historical conlanging is that
sometimes the rules come up with goodies you couldn't
foresee or dream of!
/BP 8^)>
--
Benct Philip Jonsson -- melroch atte melroch dotte se
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"C'est en vain que nos Josués littéraires crient
à la langue de s'arrêter; les langues ni le soleil
ne s'arrêtent plus. Le jour où elles se *fixent*,
c'est qu'elles meurent." (Victor Hugo)
Reply