Re: New Lang, but Just For Fun
From: | nicole perrin <nicole.eap@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, January 19, 2000, 1:06 |
Patrick Dunn wrote:
>
> > Not as pretty as Jennifer's Romance lang, but amusing enough. Really,
> > though, I harbor a secret desire to make a Romance lang spoken in the
> > east, maybe somewhere between Romania and Russia, so it can use the
> > Cyrillic alphabet. That would be fun, yeah, it would have lots of
> > Slavic inflences too (read: retention of case inflection). Oh well,
> > midterms start tomorrow, and I'd better get to work!
> >
> > Nicole </silly post>
>
> Hmm. I'm not sure it is so silly. I really kind of like it, although
> maybe because I know nothing about Japanese and wish that I did.
>
> As far as implausible -- sure, but this is *art*, not science. Call it a
> "what if": what if Japan had contact with Rome?
Well, I don't know that much about Japanese either, I just have handy
references (read: friends who know Japanese). It was actually pretty
convenient to just ask them questions about what would be plausible,
that's where I got the verb system from. At first I was going to
distribute the verbs into different classes, but it seemed simpler (and
more pidgin-like) to just simplify them into the easiest one.
Christophe, don't you know Japanese? And I'm sure other people do too.
How do you recommend I do adjectives and adverbs? What's the Japanese
situation regarding them?
Nicole
--
nicole.eap@snet.net
http://nicole.conlang.org
--
"They look like white elephants," she said.
"I've never seen one," the man drank his beer.
"No, you wouldn't have."