Re: Answering some points

"David Peterson" <DigitalScream@...> wrote:
> There are languages in which the future is behind, the past is in front,
> and humans don't move along a path towards a future, but rather the past
> pushes away in front of them.
Such as English, if you take 'before' (earlier/in front of, cf. 'fore') and
'after' (later/behind, cf. 'aft').

So the language doesn't _necessarily_ determine/reflect the worldview (or at
least the current worldview).  Anyway...

     *Muke!
--
http://www.southern.edu/~alrivera/