Re: Cerebral consonants & transliterarion

Sally Caves wrote:

> Daniel Andreasson wrote:
>
> > Wow! Imagine that. I've been able to help Sally the Conlanger Estelvema! :)
> > (was that even remotely correct?)
I think I misunderstood your question... I thought you were asking about the correctness of
your definition of retroflex consonants, but it occurs to me that you were asking about the
correctness of your Teonaht!  Yes, that's remotely correct!  You've called me the "starlike
Conlanger," and I am guligyb ta rohs, "tickled pink!"  Now, you are correct, grammatically,
but I'm not so sure about the verity of your compliment; even so, it's really nice
to know someone is
READING the stuff you put up on the web.  The counter tells me that it's being read, but
I don't know by whom.  So thanks a million, Daniel!

Sally Caves
scaves@frontiernet.net
http://www.frontiernet.net/~scaves/teonaht.html


>
>