Re: Slavic Conlangs (was Re: Hello to you all!)
From: | Frank George Valoczy <valoczy@...> |
Date: | Friday, March 1, 2002, 18:20 |
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Y.Penzev wrote:
> Waiting impatiently. The idea of Slavic conlangs is pretty interesting. I
> don't think many people try it. I've got a couple of ideas, a definetely
> naturalistic "just one more Slavic", and another one inspired by some
> recent references to Tok Pisin - so it shoud be a Russian-based pidgin. But
> they are still just ideas... No time for art -- poor me!
I had a Slavic conlang, or perhaps more accurately we could say that it
was two langs with the same name, Vranian. The first one can still be seen
at http://members.tripod.com/~tuonela/vranske/vranian.html , the second
never made it on the web. The first one was designed to be the language of
a micronation I started with a number of friends (for the large part,
ex-Yugoslavs), so as you may guess, Vranian v 1.0 became Yugoslavian
(kinda like speaking Serbian and Croatian at once, giving things like
"zeleznicki kolodvor").
Vranian v 2.0 looked and sounded like Polish, Czech, Hungarian and
Romanian all thrown into a blender. All the papers on it are gone a long
time, but I do remember this much of it:
[n-j1z2v1sma vranska s1nd1kal1tcna dZr=Zava]
"Independent Vranian syndicalist state"
---ferko