Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: OT: Opinions wanted: person of vocatives

From:Erich Rickheit KSC <rickheit-cnl@...>
Date:Friday, July 4, 2003, 4:22
Joe wrote:
> Should worship be recitation of archaic language? I mean, would you have > supported mass to be retained in Latin, when the everyday person could not > understand it?
I've been watching this discussion from the sidelines, and as a Hellenic reconstructionist, I want to throw in my two obols. For whose benefit is the recitation of prayers? If prayers are for the gods, they should be done in a manner, and therefore a language, that is pleasing to the gods. More precisely, when you are speaking to your god, are you presuming on a former relationship? Do you want to make to your god a show of continuity: "See, we are the people that have worshipped you all along. We're keeping the old covenant." If prayers are part of an agreement with your god, do you want to change them in mid-stream? Are you sure you're not changing your relationship thererby? In our reconstruction work, we perform sung or chanted prayers and formulas in Attic Greek (using a reconstructed pronunciation), though we try to make sure all present uderstand the meaning. The basic formula for Greek civic ritual involves reminding the gods of your relationships with them, followed by prayers and promises of offerings, followed by the offerings in earnest. Because we want to stress an old relationship (one, sadly, without continuity) we try to use ancients forms and words, ones they've been accustomed to. We repeat the substance of our prayers and promises in Attic and English, so we can understand them too, and be sure we're speaking from the heart. (also because my Attic Greek isn't very good yet) Of course I think the doctrine, the Bible, needs to be available to every worshipper; and I agree that prayers not understood can easily turn into empty mouthings. But I thought it curious to see all this argument about how the prayers were all about the worshipper's needs, not the gods. To try and ObConLang this, what do people think about creating neologisms in dead languages? If we need to mention cars or computers or airplanes, how would you suggest constructing vocabulary that is sensible in Attic to describe these? Erich

Replies

Costentin Cornomorus <elemtilas@...>
Joe <joe@...>
Peter Bleackley <peter.bleackley@...>