Re: OT: What makes a good conlang? (was Re: Super OT: Re: CHAT: JRRT)

Teoh wrote:

<<I'm still not sure if Tamahí phonology is more "naturalistic"... it has to
*somewhat* resemble Ebisédian, being a descendent lang, although I've
taken the liberty to introduce such sound changes as:
    H -> G -> g
    h -> x -> k_h>>

I'll defer to others on this, but if you've got the directionality of these 
sound changes listed right, they seem...well, backward.   I can't imagine them 
happening--at least not categorically.   Any thoughts on this, anyone?

-David

Reply