abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary
From: | Philip Newton <philip.newton@...> |
Date: | Friday, May 24, 2002, 19:51 |
On 23 May 02, at 16:08, John Cowan wrote:
> I think so. I prefer to reserve the term "syllabary" only for what
> you have been calling a "non-featural syllabary", and use the
> terms "abjad" and "abugida" otherwise. Hangul is clearly none of these:
> it is an alphabet.
What's the difference between an abjad, an abugida, and a syllabary?
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Newton <Philip.Newton@...>
Reply