>yes , to solve this puzzle trust your first inclinations and build on
>them . it's like a 3-D crossword , and one dimension is of how language
>makes an organic sense respectful of life and existence .
Ah, so it's *supposed* to be a puzzle?
>i can't really use the = sign ; it's not a symbol in the language , but it
>could be , but it's not , but it used to be , but it never did mean
>equality anyway. you can use it though .
I didn't mean that the symbol would have to be exactly that - making a
similar list with whatever symbol you use for equality would work the same.
(I still think that first set has a little too less information for an
unambiguous solution.)
John Vertical