Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: What features do P-I-E languages have in common?

From:Elyse Grasso <emgrasso@...>
Date:Thursday, July 17, 2003, 16:15
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 06:34 pm, JS Bangs wrote:
> Thomas R. Wier sikyal: > > > Quoting John Cowan <jcowan@...>: > > > > > Mark J. Reed scripsit: > > > > > > > Okay, my goal is to design a family of languages that all
descend
> > > > from PIE, but have been completely isolated from all other > > > > members of that family for the past few tens of millennia > > > > > > The time depth of PIE is only about 6000 years. > > > > This is by no means universally accepted, though it is the currently > > reigning orthodoxy. In particular, those who advocate an Anatolian > > Urheimat, such as Colin Renfrew, usually claim an age of somewhere > > between 7,000 and 9,000 years B.P., when agriculture was spreading > > out of Anatolia into Europe and elsewhere. One of the key pieces of > > evidence usually cited in favor of the orthodox age is the fact that > > a PIE root for "wheel" can be reconstructed, and no wheels have been > > discovered earlier than about 6,000 years B.P. > > > > (While I have no strong opinion on this, I have never gotten an > > adequate response about the existence of wheels existing in > > PreColumbian Meso-America which were used only with toys, and > > not with modes of transportation.) > > Curious--what is the inconsistency here? The wheel could easily have
been
> invented multiple times, and as for its failure to become important in > Meso-America, I have always heard that attributed to the lack of large > pack animals to make carts/plows worthwhile. > > Curious that that Incas never invented carts to hook up to their
llamas,
> though. >
I think carts need a combination of suitably sized draft animals and suitable (i.e. not too vertical or bumpy) terrain to be really useful. Also a good way of harnessing the critter (horse collars were a fairly late (and revolutionary) development: there´s a reason ox-carts came first). Aside from the obvious Andean terrain problems, llamas may be a little on the small side for pulling carts, or their anatomy may not be easily adaptable for pulling against a harness instead of carrying weight in saddlebags. -- Elyse Grasso The World of Cherani Station www.data-raptors.com/cherani/index.html Cherani Tradespeech www.data-raptors.com/cherani/tradespeech.html