Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: postcodes

From:John Cowan <jcowan@...>
Date:Sunday, September 22, 2002, 15:07
Padraic Brown scripsit:

> Also, the area code system doesn't place similar codes > next to each other the way our zip codes are done.
Indeed, it systematically did the opposite as long as possible. For example, 212 was New York (it is now Manhattan only) and 213, Los Angeles. Furthermore, the largest cities were assigned to the lower digits (reckoning 0 as the *highest* rather than the lowest digit, in accordance with the behavior of dial-pulse telephones).
> The old system of telephone exchanges was neat. The > first two letters of your telephone number represented > a name, which was the exchange name.
Since 0 and 1 were not assigned to any letters, they traditionally (until 1995) didn't appear at the beginning of a telephone number; therefore all area codes until that date were of the form N0X or N1X, where N = 2-9 and X = 0-9. The worst continuing annoyance of the U.S. phone system is that to call any given number, one must dial either a 7-digit number or 1 followed by a 10-digit number, and if one works the other doesn't. Why give us an annoying "You do not need to dial 1 + area code to reah that number" recording instead of just connecting the call? (This is not true of mobiles, however.) -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com Be yourself. Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where no such knowledge exists. Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup, James Clark is as perennial as the grass. --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath

Replies

Tristan <kesuari@...>
Padraic Brown <elemtilas@...>
Frank George Valoczy <valoczy@...>
Douglas Koller, Latin & French <latinfrench@...>