Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ    Attic   

Re: Conlang legal protection (WAS: Conlang music)

From:Paul Kershaw <ptkershaw@...>
Date:Thursday, January 8, 2009, 21:24
----- Original Message ----
From: Sai Emrys <saizai@...>
As I said earlier, this is not the same as the OED. In the case of
dictionaries, maps, phone books, etc., courts have ruled that - even
if the company publishing the information did all the research to
discover it - only the particular form of the compendium is copyright,
not the information itself.

=====

Actually, the OED and phone books are different things. Dictionary entries themselves
are generally not compendia. To refer back to Rural v Feist, there's certainly
no original thought put into providing the information that John Smith lives at
1212 Main Street and has a particular phone number. That's a discoverable fact,
and listing that fact without embellishment (as is generally done in a phone
book) is not a creative act which is protectable by copyright law.

Dictionary definitions, though, have a creative element. For instance, here is the first
definition of "dog" from various online dictionaries (courtesy of onelook.com;
quoted here verbatim under fair use):

1. domestic animal: a domestic carnivorous animal with a long muzzle, a fur coat, and a
long fur-covered tail, whose characteristic call is a bark. Latin name Canis
familiaris. (Source: MSN/Encarta)
1 a: canid; especially : a highly variable domestic mammal (Canis familiaris)
closely related to the gray wolf (Source: Merriam-Webster Online)
a common four-legged animal, especially kept by people as a pet or to hunt or
guard things (Source: Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary)
a. any of a large and varied group of domesticated canines (Canis familiaris)
often kept as a house pet or used for hunting, guarding people or property,
etc. (Source: YourDictionary.com)
 
Elements of these definitions are discoverable facts (such as the Latin species
designation); most, though, are embellishments that fall under copyright
protection just as much as any conlang's glossary entries would.
 
As for the OED, the definition entries themselves are copyrightable, but the
sample quotations are not.
 
-- Paul

Reply

Sai Emrys <saizai@...>